Leaders of Russia and the United States will sign a new nuclear disarmament treaty in Prague on Thursday. Under the treaty, the deployed warheads held by the two super nuclear powers will be reduced to 1,550, about 30 percent lower than a previous nuclear disarmament treaty's limitation.
[Zhang Liyun/Xinhua] |
Can we believe the implementation of the new treaty will fundamentally change the role of nuclear weapons in both countries' security strategies? Would it set a positive tone for the Nuclear Security Summit held earlier next week?
Opinion articles: |
• Nuke arms save humanity from itself
• New START a first step to a nuclear-free world
• World hails U.S.-Russia nuclear disarmament deal
• Nuclear arms still locked and loaded
• Contrasting views could present obstacles to nuclear security summit
• U.S.-Russian nuke deal no cure for real threat
• U.S.-Russia treaty remains foggy in implementation
• U.S.-Russia talks on the START follow-on treaty
• Obama's First Year: A mass of contradictions
Videos: |
News: |
• New START treaty just new start of disarmament: Global Zero
• U.N. chief hails signing of US-Russia nuclear treaty
• U.S., Russia sign new nuclear deal
• Obama heads to Prague to sign arms deal
• China welcomes new U.S.-Russia nuclear disarmament treaty
• U.S.-Russia treaty remains foggy in implementation
• U.S., Russia cut nukes by 30%
• US, Russia 'very close' to START
• Prague to host signing of US-Russia arms deal
• Russia, US close to clinch new START deal
• U.S., Russia resume talks on reducing nuclear arsenals
• U.S. implies nuclear talks with Russia might not end by April
• U.S. denies missile plan blocking arms control treaty with Russia
• Russia, U.S. resume arms treaty negotiations
• Obama calls Medvedev on START, talks nearly complete
• U.S., Russia completing negotiations on arms control treaty
• Russia: 95% of new arms treaty agreed
• U.S., Russia never so close on Iran nuclear issue
• U.S., Russia in talks over global missile defense
• Medvedev: Russia, US should ratify START treaty
Cartoons: |
Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)