RSSNewsletterSiteMapFeedback

Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / Business / News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Courts freeze 10 Wahaha units assets
Adjust font size:

The dispute between Wahaha Group and France's Groupe Danone escalated as assets of 10 foreign-registered companies under Wahaha were frozen at the request of Danone, the French firm confirmed yesterday.

 

Last Wednesday, assets of two subsidiaries of China's largest beverage maker, Mega Source Investments Ltd and Honour Bright Investments Ltd, were frozen and put into receivership under the order of the Supreme Court of Samoa in Apia, the 21st Century Business Herald said yesterday.

 

On November 9, the High Court of the British Virgin Islands placed the other eight firms registered there into receivership and froze their assets until further notice.

 

The eight firms under Wahaha were Golden Dynasty Enterprise Ltd, Gold Factory Developments Ltd, Platinum Net Ltd, Sunworld Enterprises Ltd, Great Base International Ltd, Bountiful Gold Trading Ltd, Ever Maple Trading Ltd and Wintell Enterprises Ltd.

 

Four companies under Danone filed claims against the above offshore subsidiaries of Wahaha in the British Virgin Islands and Samoa, the French food giant confirmed yesterday in a statement. But Danone refused to release further details.

 

KPMG, an international auditing firm, has been appointed receiver of each of the British Virgin Islands companies, while another receiver was appointed for the two Samoan entities.

 

Under the court orders, the receivers' primary role will be to identify, locate and secure the assets of these 10 Wahaha companies.

 

Wahaha declined to comment yesterday.

 

Industry insiders said Danone's move aims to prevent Hangzhou-based Wahaha from transferring any assets to foreign countries during the legal process.

 

Danone, which teamed up with Wahaha in 1996, filed a lawsuit on June 4 against its Chinese partner for breaching their agreement by selling Wahaha-branded beverages without its permission.

 

Danone sought more than US$100 million for the alleged illegal sales.

 

(Shanghai Daily November 21, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Comment
Username   Password   Anonymous
 
China Archives
Related >>
- Danone says Wahaha's US law firm in suit withdraws
- Danone withdraws lawsuit against trademark authority
- Trademark Body Sued in Latest Wahaha-Danone Twist
- Danone-Wahaha Joint Venture Sales Plummet
Most Viewed >>
-China set to hit the brakes on rising yuan
-Power to resume shortly in worst-hit area by snow
-Macao's gaming market expands further
-Online operators are on top of the game
-Insurance firms set to stump up billions

May 15-17, Shanghai Women's Forum Asia
Dec. 12-13 Beijing China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue
Nov. 27-28 Beijing China-EU Summit

- Output of Major Industrial Products
- Investment by Various Sectors
- Foreign Direct Investment by Country or Region
- National Price Index
- Value of Major Commodity Import
- Money Supply
- Exchange Rate and Foreign Exchange Reserve
- What does the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement cover?
- How to Set up a Foreign Capital Enterprise in China?
- How Does the VAT Works in China?
- How Much RMB or Foreign Currency Can Be Physically Carried Out of or Into China?
- What Is the Electrical Fitting in China?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright © China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP证 040089号