Addressing a recent training session for government supervisors
and Communist Party of China discipline inspectors, Wu Guanzheng, secretary of the CPC's Central
Discipline Inspection Commission, vowed to have corrupt officials
find their political careers ruined, their family fortunes lost,
and that it is too late to repent.
That is the harshest language we have ever heard from the
nation's top corruption buster.
If such resolve is implemented faithfully in handling corruption
cases, it surely would constitute the kind of deterrence Wu
envisaged.
He urged official government supervisors and Party inspectors to
dig deeper to ferret out corrupt elements and apply greater
pressure upon them. He even cited the approach of Hua Tuo, a
legendary Chinese doctor known to have scraped the patient's bones
to cure an infection, to illustrate the need for a drastic antidote
to corruption.
Wu's words belie the national leadership's eagerness to get rid
of an annoying thorn in its side: corruption scandals have turned
out to be a damaging threat to the Party's and government's images
and credibility, seriously eroding public confidence.
Party and government officials' easy access to public resources
plus the lack of oversight in the disposal of such resources has
resulted in rent-seeking by public servants.
To be fair to the authorities, they have said and done a lot
about corruption. Never before have we heard of so many corrupt
officials uncovered and dealt with. Never before has
anti-corruption as a policy initiative commanded such prominence in
official rhetoric.
But perhaps because many corruption scandals ended up failing to
meet the angry public's anticipation of severe punishments, there
is the popular impression that corrupt officials have more or less
received lenient treatment.
Wu's pledge is a positive resonance of the calls for harsh
penalties to make unruly public officials in awe of the law.
Raising the cost of a certain offence has the potential to boost
the law's validity and deterrence. Not to mention that "punish one
and deter a hundred" is a time-honored formula in the nation's
judicial tradition.
Corrupt officials are not qualified for public service.
Illegally obtained public wealth must be taken back. And it is good
to cultivate in public servants the feeling that it is too costly
to engage in corruption.
But a more imperative need in our law enforcement is to make
sure that all who violate the law are brought to justice, and that
every violator gets the penalty he or she deserves.
That is to say, we should first make our judiciary blind to the
identity of the violator.
Be he or she an ordinary citizen or high official, he or she
cannot anticipate differential treatment just because of who he or
she is.
(China Daily September 19, 2006)