Eighty-two fish farmers have won their lawsuit against the State
Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), which rejected
their request that the Zhejiang of Environmental Protection Bureau
handle a pollution case.
The farmers in Wenzhou, east China's Zhejiang Province, suffered heavy economic
losses after their fish farms were polluted in 2003 by untreated
sewage from a nearby development zone. An investigation by the
local environmental watchdog identified the development zone as the
culprit and reported the case to the provincial environmental
protection authorities.
With no decision coming from the provincial watchdog, the
farmers appealed to SEPA for help, but their request was
snubbed.
Although the farmers have won the case, a final solution to
their problems remains a long way off. This may just be the start
of a protracted battle.
The provincial environmental watchdog will probably fine the
development zone. But will the fine be heavy enough to pressurize
the zone into building a sewage treatment plant? Even if such a
facility is constructed, it will probably be left to rust in order
to cut costs.
It is quite clear that the development zone is to blame. It was
not supposed to allow its enterprises to start production before
the construction of a sewage plant. Under these circumstances, the
local environmental protection authorities were supposed to have
the power to intervene. But they are under the auspices of the
local government and would be in a quite embarrassing situation if
the latter gave the enterprises permission to commence
production.
If we suppose that the local government did not, it would be
easy to reach the conclusion that the zone should be held entirely
responsible. Then it could be fined and made to compensate the
farmers.
However, the fact that the local government had tried to bring
the situation under control by paying these farmers 13,500 yuan
(US$1,600) for each hectare of fish farm polluted suggests that the
zone got the green light to put its enterprises into operation.
Environmental watchdogs are trapped in a dilemma of being
supposed to have the power to punish polluters, but only to find
their attempts fettered by local governments' thirst for
growth.
SEPA is quite aware of its embarrassing role, having decided in
April to establish environmental watchdog offices for major
regions. The new offices are supposed to have immediate control
over their local watchdogs without any interference from local
governments, but they are yet to materialize.
This case, the first of its kind to bring SEPA to court, is not
so much a preliminary victory for those fish farmers as an example
that can be followed by environmental pollution victims to sharpen
the teeth of environmental watchdogs.
More cases of this nature will hopefully assist the battle
against pollution.
(China Daily July 20, 2006)