City management departments should give consideration to
interests of all social groups, says a signed article in Jinan
Times. An excerpt follows:
Beijingers asked in a recent survey about their satisfaction
with living in the city gave it a score of 63.8 points out of
100.
The survey, conducted by a team of researchers led by Professor
Zhang Wenzhong from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, revealed that
families with a monthly income in excess of 10,000 yuan (US$1,234)
were most satisfied with the situation, while those earning less
than 3,000 yuan (US$370) were the least satisfied with life in the
capital. This result shows that the city's administrators are
failing to pay enough attention to Beijing's poorer residents.
It is a common problem in Chinese cities that city management
despises the poor and curries favour with the rich. For example, in
the name of upgrading the image of cities, they forcefully
eliminate roadside stalls ran by low-income earners, while also
moving them out of the city centre through compulsory resettlement
to inconvenient suburban areas. In some cities, bicycle lanes are
scrapped to make room for cars. In a nutshell, this makes life
easier for better-off people but only makes matters worse for
poorer residents.
Some city administrators place image at the core of their urban
development plans. Such a mindset leads to the disappearance of old
communities, street vendors and bicycle lanes. Such behaviour
appeals to elite groups, those with a greater influence over
government's policy-making.
Urban low-income earners also contribute to the cities, so due
respect should be paid to their interests and needs. But their
influence on urban construction and management is sadly lacking.
Low and medium-income earners have fewer chances to make their
voices heard.
The only way to change this situation is to give low-income
earners more opportunities of political participation. They should
be able to influence policy-making, and urge city management
departments to take into account the interests of all people.
(China Daily July 6, 2006)