A newly passed local regulation will encourage bolder reforms
and wider participation by the public into government
decisions.
The regulation clearly stipulates some situations to waive the
responsibility of officials when schemes they initiate do not
fulfill expected results.
The Regulation of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone for Reform
and Innovation Promotion won a majority of votes from the standing
committee of the Shenzhen People's Congress in its third reading of
the regulation on Tuesday. The regulation will be effective as of
July 1.
"It's definitely a bold step towards developing a wide-range of
reforms in the city, which is dubbed an 'experimental field' in
political and economic reforms," Yang Lixun, a professor with
Shenzhen Academy of Social Science, told China Daily
yesterday.
According to the regulation, officials must draft and implement
reform plans conforming to a required procedure. This will ensure
that individuals and related institutions are not benefiting from
the project.
Liu Shuguang, deputy director of the Committee of Legislative
Affairs of Shenzhen People's Congress, said the regulation, though
controversial, could protect the reformers and foster a sounder
environment for reform.
"Some legislators suggested rejecting the regulation to avoid
causing losses to the country. But reform is complicated and high
risk. If we don't tolerate mistakes, no one will be willing to make
changes," Liu said.
Reform and innovation are the legal responsibility of all
national institutes, public non-profit organizations and public
societies, according to the regulation.
These entities should explain to the public if they do not
propose a reform plan, or if the reform is different from what the
public wants.
They may also be punished for rejecting or holding back reforms
and innovation, or by making personal benefits in the name of the
reform.
To encourage these entities to positively launch reform plans,
the municipal government will set up a reform and innovation award
for: Organizations and individuals who have actively pushed forward
reforms; those who have gained great achievements in reforms and
innovation research; those whose suggestions, after being adopted,
have produced great economic and social benefits; and those who
have rendered outstanding contributions to reform and
innovation.
For every essential reform regarding the public interest, the
concerned departments are required by the regulation to hold
hearings.
"It's the first time in the country that major opinions
collected from hearings could decide policy," Liu said.
Professor Yang believed Shenzhen would gradually develop a
system to regulate the whole reform procedure, which would lead the
way for other Chinese cities.
"Previously government officials had the final say on what to
reform. Soon the situation will be changed," Yang said.
"Every reform will have a pattern to follow involving appraisal,
public opinion and evaluation. This will reduce the blindness and
randomness in reform practices," he added.
(China Daily March 16, 2006)