Good news for those who are disheartened by our urban planners'
bad tastes.
The desperate public appeals for better building styles, in
spite of recalcitrant disregard by local administrators, received
sympathy on Friday from Zhongnanhai, headquarters of the national
leadership.
At a brain-storming session about major public infrastructures,
Vice-Premier Zeng Peiyan compared notes with experts about ways to
stem wastefulness, as well as following a blind pursuit of grandeur
and outlandishness in urban planning.
Echoing Premier Wen Jiabao's instructions in a recent
memorandum, Zeng accentuated quality, safety, resource
conservation, and environmental protection in urban
development.
Such essential concerns that should have been present in all
development programmes are regrettably vulnerable to neglect by
image-sensitive local urban planning authorities.
Chinese urban planners share a notorious appetite for grandiose
landmarks to prop up self-confidence. But symbols of so-called
modernity are little more than spacious plazas and steel-and-glass
structures with a metallic lustre. Thirst for a modern, or
post-modern look plus poor judgment has cultivated an addictive
obsession with huge weird architectures as proud new landmarks.
Instead of practical functions, economy, safety, resource
conservation, environmental-friendliness, and contextual harmony,
they are preoccupied with grandiosity.
Architectural tributes to our history and culture should not be
demonstrated through mimicking ancient buildings. In fact, we find
adding traditional sloping roofs to modern architectures, a strange
practice once popular in Beijing, a mockery of architectural
wisdom.
But since history is no longer in vogue these days, unbridled
enthusiasm for post-modern structures is proving itself a bigger
threat to out urban skylines.
There is the saying that our cities have become paradise for
imaginative architects from all over the world. Indeed, few can
rival our city managers as accommodating hosts. They may not be as
open-minded in other areas. But in trying out bold new designs,
they always seem receptive.
Zeng put forward many thoughtful suggestions about large public
infrastructures. We are especially impressed by his advice that
architectural features should conform with overall urban planning,
and that architectural layout should take into consideration the
bigger urban landscape and surrounding environment.
(China Daily September 11, 2006)