The Chinese mainland said on Tuesday that despite strong
opposition from people across the Taiwan Straits and the
international community Taiwan leader, Chen Shui-bian, had declared
that the "National Unification Council" would "cease to function"
and the guidelines on unification would "cease to apply."
Chen didn't use the word "abolish" but said "cease." "It's just
a play on words as his real intention is to cheat the Taiwan public
and the world," the Taiwan Work Office of the Chinese Communist
Party Central Committee and the Taiwan Affairs Office of the
State Council said in a joint statement.
The statement said that Chen's scheme on "Taiwan independence"
was obviously known to all. He actually sped up activities for
"independence" by using the word "cease" and referring to the
"National Unification Council"and the "National Unification
Guidelines."
But lying to the world doesn't involve changing the status quo.
He maliciously challenged the cross-Straits peace and caused great
tension in bilateral relationships by suggesting that "the mainland
poses threat to Taiwan." The statement said Chen closed the door to
cross-Straits consultation and was selfishly imposing the
nightmare of "Taiwan independence" advocated by a few people on the
23 million Taiwan people, yet he calls it "respects the free choice
of Taiwan people."
"The level and danger of 'Taiwan independence' activities
promoted by Chen Shui-bian continues to rise," said the joint
statement, "Such tricks of Chen Shui-bian have already been seen
through by the world. He will only end up hurting himself in this
farce."
The statement emphasizes again that the mainland will resolutely
oppose Chen's efforts to legitimize "Taiwan independence" by his
"constitutional reforms." It's now considered to be among the most
important and urgent tasks of the Chinese government. "If his aim
is achieved, it will inevitably create intense tension of
cross-Straits relations and gravely imperil peace and stability
across the Taiwan Straits and in the Asia-Pacific region in
general," continued the statement.
Chen's attempts are doomed to fail and will only result
in big disasters for Taiwan's society because "Taiwan
independence" goes against everything in mainstream Chinese
history. And "it's against the will and wishes of 1.3 billion
Chinese people," the statement pointed out. It also calls on
Taiwan's people to assist prevent Chen's efforts, and maintain
and promote both sides' economic and cultural communions, peaceful
and stable relations between the cross-Straits and promote
peaceful unification.
"We'll never tolerate 'Taiwan independence' or allow Taiwan
secessionist activities to separate Taiwan from the motherland in
name or in any other way," said the statement.
Chen Shui-bian announced in Taipei Monday afternoon a decision
to stop the operations of the "National Unification Council" and
application of the National Unification Guidelines soon after the
so-called "Meeting of National Security Council."
Taiwan's major Parties, including Chinese Kuomintang, the People
First Party and Non-Partisan Solidarity Union, major associations
and other groupings had strongly opposed and criticized Chen's
proposal before he took this recent action.
Taiwan businessmen, who have funded 68,095 projects on the
mainland with investments of US$89.69 billion to the end of last
year, were worried about possible repercussions. The United States,
Taiwan's major arms supplier, had also pressed Chen not to scrap
the Council fearing this could lead to "Taiwan independence"
problems. Washington reiterated that it "does not support Taiwan's
independence and opposes unilateral changes to the status quo."
Major Hong Kong newspapers carried editorials on Monday
criticizing the secession activities of Chen Shui-bian.
The Chinese language Takungpao printed an editorial
titled "Chen's 'NUC'-Abolishing Attempts to Destroy Peaceful
cross-Straits Situation." It said that recent developments
suggested that Chen had decided to go his own way but will "run
into a blank wall." The editorial added that although public
opinion, the majority of political parties and figures were opposed
to Chen's stance he was not listening the views of others.
The newspaper said that in the last six years Chen had made
constant references to "Taiwan Independence." He not only wanted to
abolish the "NUC" but also break promises made on May 20, 2000. All
these facts clearly displayed that Chen was an illogical
gambler.
On May 20, 2000, Chen promised not to declare "Taiwan
independence," not to incorporate the "two states" proposal into
"the constitution," not to change the "country's name," not to hold
a "referendum on Taiwan independence" and not to abolish the "NUC"
and "NUG."
Wen Wei Po warned Chen in an editorial that he would get
burnt if he played with fire. The newspaper said Chen's recent
statements proved he was the biggest troublemaker in cross-Straits
relations for Taiwan and to the entire Asia Pacific Region. It
added that his crazy challenging acts would surely endanger the
peace and stability across the Taiwan Straits. His acts would be
strongly opposed by all Chinese in the world and he was doomed to
failure.
The daily said Chen's dangerous comments on abolishing the "NUC"
was a rapid escalation of his secession activities. The
"Taiwan independence" secession activities were the biggest source
of turmoil in the area and were a threat to cross-Straits
relations.
The editorial urged Chen "to wake up to and avoid danger at the
last moment."
Hong Kong Commercial Daily's editorial, titled "Chen's
extravagant gambling is doomed to failure," said Chen's backing for
the abolishment of the "NUC" was a gamble…putting a bet on the
happiness, welfare and future of Taiwan compatriots and the peace
and stability across the Taiwan Straits.
The article said Chen's position was against the will of Taiwan
compatriots and it would lead to nothing but failure.
Hong Kong Economic Times said in its editorial that
Chen's hastening towards "Taiwan independence" was an extravagant
bet on peace.
The editorial said the earlier bribe scandal and poor governance
of Chen's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would not allow the
party to succeed in the coming elections so this was an
effort to transfer public attention away from a number
of issues. If his attempts succeeded on this occasion he would
simply do more to promote his "Taiwan independence" ideas.
(Xinhua News Agency, China.org.cn February 28, 2006)