European Union (EU) Chamber of Commerce member companies are
generally profitable in China and optimistic about their future
here, according to a position paper released yesterday.
But the European Chambers' European Business in China Position
Paper 2006/07 said European companies still face numerous obstacles
in the country such as a lack of transparency in government
regulation, and intellectual protection rights (IPR)
protection.
The five-year accession period for China's entry into the World
Trade Organization (WTO) will come to an end on December 11, 2006.
"It is commonly agreed that China has implemented the majority of
commitments on, or even ahead of, schedule and there is little
doubt that WTO accession has brought many benefits to both China
and the EU," said Serge Janssens de Varebeke, president of the
European Chamber.
China's economic status and power continues to grow. In 2005,
China surpassed the United Kingdom to become the world's
fourth-largest economy and the world's third-largest exporter.
China's trade relations with the EU have also greatly expanded.
The EU remains China's largest trading partner and China the EU's
second largest.
EU imports from China reached US$158 billion in 2005, an
increase of 24 percent. At the same time, EU exports to China grew
by 7 percent year-on-year. The annual inflow of EU foreign direct
investment into China for 2004 was US$3 billion, approximately the
same as 2003 and 2002. In 2004, 56 percent of China's global
exports came from foreign-invested firms.
The European Chamber's paper is based on a survey of its 1,000
members. It indicated the vast majority of respondents, 92 percent,
are optimistic about the overall business outlook in China. The
majority also believed China's economic reforms have contributed to
an improvement of the business environment.
In terms of profitability, 83 percent of respondents expected to
be profitable in 2006. But of those who did not expect to be
profitable in 2006, 71 percent expected their operations to become
profitable within three years. Although 23 percent of respondents
generated a net loss in 2005, only 7 percent expected to generate a
loss in 2006. Despite this, the European companies still face
obstacles. "The same as last year, the most common obstacles are
government regulation transparency and IPR protection issues," said
Janssens de Varebeke.
And some of the companies felt more could be done by China to
implement WTO rules and regulations. Although 71 percent of the
respondents believed China is willing to adhere to the principles
and spirit of the WTO, 21 percent said China is only willing to
implement specific commitments such as those explicitly set forth
in the accession document.
European Chamber members identified a lack of transparency as
the largest obstacle to do business in China. They said it is not
uncommon for drafts of new laws and regulations to be circulated
only to Chinese partners of joint ventures or select companies that
are given very short timeframes to reply. In addition, the time
span between publishing new legislation and implementation is often
too short to allow for timely compliance.
"I don't think China has gone far enough," said Joerg Wuttke,
chief representative of BASF China. "As part of its commitment to
the WTO, China is expected to open renminbi business to foreign
banks by December 11, but now it has not taken measures in this
respect with only a few months left, we are waiting for that."
Concerns also remained over an increase in China-specific
additions to internationally accepted standards. The development of
country-specific standards present obstacles to international trade
and may be perceived as contrary to the WTO principles of freer and
fairer trade, said the paper.
"China should create a level playing field, and non-tariffs
should disappear," said Janssens de Varebeke.
Over the past year, progress has been made in various aspects of
IPR protection. This includes the State Trademark Office's decision
to provide free public access to its database, a key recommendation
in the 2005 Position Paper.
(China Daily September 6, 2006)