Northeast China will benefit from greater reliance on private
investment, less government intervention in local economy, and
continued government aid for infrastructure investments, education,
and social protection and services, according to two World Bank
study reports.
Revitalizing the Northeast: Towards a Development Strategy, one
of the studies by the bank, urges shifting attitudes away from the
Northeast's role as a historical supply base in favor of focusing
on its ability to respond to future market demands.
The three Northeast provinces are also in need to work together
an economic bloc to support and pitch in the rapid and sustained
growth of China as a whole, said the report.
Facilitating Investment and Innovation: A Market-Oriented
Approach to Northeast Revitalization, the other report released
Tuesday ascribes lags in Northeast growth, foreign investment, and
productivity to lack of a vibrant private sector and continued
state dominance of the region's industry.
The report calls for improved key investment climate to spur
foreign and domestic private investment would include simpler
procedures to start a new business; greater transparency in land
use, taxes, and administrative fees; fewer restrictions or
regulations on foreign investment into specific industries and into
transport and logistics service; improved access to finance for
small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs); and continued effort to
modernize urban infrastructure and improve urban quality of
life.
One concern is that continued SOE dominance of the Northeast's
economy could "squeeze out" more dynamic private businesses.
SOE transformation should follow commercial best practices,
which would involve, among others, the effective corporate
governance and greater ownership diversification for large SOEs,
according to the reports.
The World Bank study sees a need for additional reforms to
increase the sustainability and efficiency of major programs,
including the jobless insurance, minimum subsistence payment in
urban areas, and pensions.
Investments in urban infrastructure and quality of life, SOE
reform, and social protection will require the pooling of
substantial financial resources, the bank acknowledged.
The bank studies suggest, however, that the Northeast could
arouse significant financial resources on its own, for instance by
ending subsidies to loss-making locally-administered SOEs and
ensuing commercial best-practices for the sale or management of SOE
shares and assets.
Citing problems with central-local government transfers, the
report on Northeast development strategy also recommends a
comprehensive review and additional rationalization of the
inter-governmental fiscal system.
A more balanced approach toward expenditure assignments and
transfers, greater opportunities for tax revenue mobilization by
local governments, and more authority to borrow (with appropriate
controls) at the local levels would make it easier for the
Northeast to finance a variety of public programs, according to the
report.
The bank noted that the central and local governments continue
to have a vital role in Northeast development, but direct
interventions, such as the designation of "pillar" industrial
sectors and government-financed investments, are increasingly
inappropriate.
"As China moves increasingly toward an innovation-driven
economy, the government's role should shift toward facilitating
private investment and innovation and providing broad support for
education and urban quality of life," the bank said.
(Xinhua News Agency March 9, 2006)